On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 17:03 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > while we are at it: is it intentional that the log file signing > feature defaults to no and log file encryption is default=yes? >
mhhhh... good point. The answer is probably "no" in the latter case. What would you consider good defaults? Rainer > 2013/4/24 Michael Biebl <[email protected]>: > > 2013/4/24 Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]>: > >> On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 14:08 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > >>> > >>> "Log file signing support (using GuardTime)" > >>> "Log file encryption support (using libgcrypt)" > >>> > >>> it would be a little clearer I think. You can optionally drop the > >>> "(using ...)", as that is rather an implementation detail. > > > > Just a tiny nitpick: > > ./configure --help now shows: > > --enable-libgcrypt Enable log file encryption support (libgcrypt=) > > > > Is the "=" a typo? > > > > Michael > > > _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
