anything's possible :-)

Rsyslog gains new capabilities by a couple of different methods

1. people write a feature and submit it. This is how the UDP spoofing module came about, my company needed this capability, so I wrote a module and submitted it (it's been improved since then)

2. people sponsor someone else to write a feature (Rainer and adiscon do this sort of work all the time, contact him directly for a quote on adding the feature if you're interested)

3. people suggest features and they go somewhere on a mile-long TODO list, if there is enough interest from other people, Rainer or someone else will write the feature.

unfortunantly, things are being added to the TODO list faster than they are being implemented (not an unusual situation), so you need to make a case that a feature is needed by a lot of people, or somehow make it 'interesting' enough for someone to want to tackle.

In the particular case of UDP spoofing, this is only needed if you are relaying messages to a broken syslog system that ignores the hostname in the header and only looks at the IP address in the packet. The amount of interest in working around such broken systems tends to not be very high (for some strange reason ;-)

I'll point out that it's very easy to have the rsyslog relay box replace the hostname in the message with the IP address of the sending system if the issue you are trying to deal with is trusting the hostname in the message.

If you can deal with structured data on the receiver, you can even put both in the message without loosing any ability to parse out the original info.

David Lang

On Mon, 30 Sep 2013, Ganji, Shashirekha Yadav wrote:

Thanks for your response.
Is it possible to have this capability in future or any other way to 
incorporate this into rsyslog?

Thanks,
shashi

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Lang
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 12:47 PM
To: rsyslog-users
Subject: Re: [rsyslog] UDP spoofing output module (omudpspoof)

this module does not talk IPv6, so it can't forge IPv6 source addresses or send 
to IPv6 destination addresses.

David Lang

On Mon, 30 Sep 2013, Ganji, Shashirekha Yadav wrote:

Hello team,

I had a question on the mentioned output module.
It is mentioned that "IPv6 is currently not supported. If you need this capability, 
please let us know via the rsyslog mailing list." As a known issue.I need more 
clarity on this.
Does it mean this output module does not support IPV6 address for target or 
overall IPV6 traffic.
Thanks,
shashi

_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE
WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites 
beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.

_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is 
a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our 
control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to