what version? it may only be in 7.5.

David Lang

On Wed, 9 Oct 2013, Robert McIntyre wrote:

Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:41:04 -0700
From: Robert McIntyre <[email protected]>
Reply-To: rsyslog-users <[email protected]>
To: rsyslog-users <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [rsyslog] perfomance tweaking

sadly, when I try to add resetCounters="on" to my impstats config line, I get a 
"parameter 'resetCounters' not known" error from rsyslog...

--Robert

To: [email protected]
From: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [rsyslog] perfomance tweaking
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:41:33 -0700







Oh, my!  I've wanted this reset feature for a year, and didn't know it already 
existed!!!


Thanks!

Robert



From:
David Lang

Sent:
‎10/‎9/‎2013 1:57 PM

To:
rsyslog-users

Subject:
Re: [rsyslog] perfomance tweaking




by the way, if you change the pstats frequency to 10 seconds, the math becomes

easier to do :-)


you can also change pstats so that it zeros the counters after each report (

resetCounters = 'on' )


David Lang


On Wed, 9 Oct 2013, David Lang wrote:


Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 13:54:40 -0700 (PDT)

From: David Lang <[email protected]>

Reply-To: rsyslog-users <[email protected]>

To: Robert <[email protected]>

Cc: rsyslog-users <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: [rsyslog] perfomance tweaking



I don't understand your question, the data is already in the pstats output





Wed Oct  9 14:10:16 2013: imuxsock: submitted=3 ratelimit.discarded=0

ratelimit.numratelimiters=3

Wed Oct  9 14:10:16 2013: action 1: processed=24393988 failed=0

Wed Oct  9 14:10:16 2013: imudp(*:514): submitted=40566658

Wed Oct  9 14:10:16 2013: imudp(*:514): submitted=0

Wed Oct  9 14:10:16 2013: resource-usage: utime=123027297 stime=170668054

maxrss=16052540 minflt=4690530 majflt=0 inblock=24 oublock=236848

nvcsw=4243465 nivcsw=95855

Wed Oct  9 14:10:16 2013: main Q: size=16173779 enqueued=40565767 full=0

discarded.full=0 discarded.nf=0 maxqsize=16230763

Wed Oct  9 14:10:46 2013: imuxsock: submitted=3 ratelimit.discarded=0

ratelimit.numratelimiters=3

Wed Oct  9 14:10:46 2013: action 1: processed=27501988 failed=0

Wed Oct  9 14:10:46 2013: imudp(*:514): submitted=47124137

Wed Oct  9 14:10:46 2013: imudp(*:514): submitted=0

Wed Oct  9 14:10:46 2013: resource-usage: utime=139695763 stime=198527819

maxrss=19379688 minflt=5653736 majflt=0 inblock=24 oublock=266616

nvcsw=4811818 nivcsw=97742

Wed Oct  9 14:10:46 2013: main Q: size=19623475 enqueued=47123463 full=0

discarded.full=0 discarded.nf=0 maxqsize=19642827



these reports are 30 seconds apart,



so imudp started with submitted=40566658 and ended with submitted=47124137

for 6,557,479 new messages or 218,582 per second



action1 started with processed=24393988 and ended with processed=27501988 for

3,108,000 messages written or 103,600 per second





after the queue was full you had





Wed Oct  9 14:10:46 2013: imuxsock: submitted=3 ratelimit.discarded=0

ratelimit.numratelimiters=3

Wed Oct  9 14:10:46 2013: action 1: processed=27501988 failed=0

Wed Oct  9 14:10:46 2013: imudp(*:514): submitted=47124137

Wed Oct  9 14:10:46 2013: imudp(*:514): submitted=0

Wed Oct  9 14:10:46 2013: resource-usage: utime=139695763 stime=198527819

maxrss=19379688 minflt=5653736 majflt=0 inblock=24 oublock=266616

nvcsw=4811818 nivcsw=97742

Wed Oct  9 14:10:46 2013: main Q: size=19623475 enqueued=47123463 full=0

discarded.full=0 discarded.nf=0 maxqsize=19642827

Wed Oct  9 14:11:16 2013: imuxsock: submitted=3 ratelimit.discarded=0

ratelimit.numratelimiters=3

Wed Oct  9 14:11:16 2013: action 1: processed=33695988 failed=0

Wed Oct  9 14:11:16 2013: imudp(*:514): submitted=53654000

Wed Oct  9 14:11:16 2013: imudp(*:514): submitted=0

Wed Oct  9 14:11:16 2013: resource-usage: utime=169091294 stime=226619548

maxrss=19833880 minflt=6075432 majflt=0 inblock=24 oublock=325944

nvcsw=5969014 nivcsw=100429

Wed Oct  9 14:11:16 2013: main Q: size=19959523 enqueued=53653511 full=168

discarded.full=0 discarded.nf=0 maxqsize=20000000



imudp started with submitted=47124137 and eded with submitted=53654000 for

6,529,836 new messages or 217,662 per second



action 1 started with processed=27501988 and ended with processed=33695988

for 6,196,000 messages written or 206,446 per second



David Lang





On Wed, 9 Oct 2013, Robert wrote:



Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 16:34:42 -0400

From: Robert <[email protected]>

To: David Lang <[email protected]>

Cc: Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]>, rmkml <[email protected]>,

    rsyslog-users <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: perfomance tweaking



Is there any documentation on how to cretae throughput report (stats) ?





Robert.



_______________________________________________

rsyslog mailing list

http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog

http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/

What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards

NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of

sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T

LIKE THAT.



_______________________________________________

rsyslog mailing list

http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog

http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/

What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards

NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.



_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to