That's what I assumed. I was mostly trying to remember what the scenario for the memory leak. It definitely does seem to match the problem I'm seeing.
Thanks everyone. -- James -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rainer Gerhards Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 1:36 AM To: rsyslog-users Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Question about fixed re_extract memory leak On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Robert McIntyre <[email protected]>wrote: > IIRC, it would leak if a match wasn't found. But there may have been > another issue/fix as well. > > That's what I remember as well. But the overall picture was "you *need* to update/apply patch" if you use that functionality. Rainer _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
