Hi Reinoud, you managed to hijack this thread, I've now changed at least the subject ;) More inline below.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Reinoud Koornstra < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Rainer, > > How're you? > I am thrilled to hear that you decided to use jemalloc instead of the > normal malloc. > Way more efficient memory management for sure and i've used it for quite > some time. > I'll look on how you implemented it, as for me, i just switched malloc > with je_malloc as i configured it that way. > It's just a configure option. If --enable-jemalloc is given, we link to its libs. That's it. > Any new measurements in terms of performance compared to using normal > malloc? > none done myself, but Pavel posted some impressive numbers in the past week or two (that actually made me switch). So it's probably best to search the ML archive. Rainer _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
