Maybe a dumb question but how would you go about following that chain?

On 12/9/13, 3:22 PM, "David Lang" <[email protected]> wrote:

>The hostname field is supposed to be filled out by the system that's
>generating 
>the log, if it sends a log without a hostname field, the first machine
>that 
>receives the log tries to fill it in, with a hostname from reverse DNS if
>configured, or with the sending IP address if the DNS lookup fails (or is
>disabled)
>
>follow the chain from the originating system on and see where it's
>picking up 
>the IP address.
>
>David Lang
>
>
>On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, Dan Finn wrote:
>
>> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 18:43:14 +0000
>> From: Dan Finn <[email protected]>
>> Reply-To: rsyslog-users <[email protected]>
>> To: rsyslog-users <[email protected]>
>> Subject: [rsyslog] strange change in filtering since upgrading to v7
>> 
>> Remote servers:
>> CentOS 5.10
>> rsyslog-7.4.6-1.el5.centos
>>
>> Client servers:
>> RHEL 5.4
>> rsyslog-5.8.6-1.ep
>>
>> Remote config : http://pastebin.com/xp5wy02d
>> Client config: http://pastebin.com/17qYD6WX
>>
>> As far as I know nothing has changed on the client side and the only
>>change that we have made recently to our logging environment is
>>upgrading our remote servers from v4 to v7 (huge performance
>>improvement!).  It was noticed recently that the filtering on one of our
>>apps is no longer working as expected.  Instead of the logs getting
>>written to /var/log/apps/year/hostname/day/hour/jboss.log they are
>>ending up in /var/log/apps/year/IP address/day/hour/jboss.log.  I
>>personally don¹t think this is related to the v7 upgrade but this is
>>causing some pain for us with our log scrapers and I¹ve been asked to
>>verify with the mailing list.
>>
>> So far it looks like this is the only application that we have that
>>this is happening with.  This is Jboss and it¹s logging via log4j.  All
>>other apps and OS logs seems to be working just fine.
>>
>> Here is a current log entry:
>>
>> 2013-12-09T11:00:00-07:00 10.42.30.10 local4: 11:00:00,094
>>atgprod1-prod_public_8180 atg-log WARN  [BrandCategoryLookupD
>> roplet] 1414419202  dogfunk
>>7CE0625028E65F3843D63FE249CD0125.atgprod1-prod_public_8180
>>/Store/catalog/brandLanding.jsp?b
>> 
>>randId=100000630&categoryId=dfCat100434&p=discountPercentUS%3A%5B40+TO+*%
>>5D%7Csize%3Asmall (http-0.0.0.0-8180-187) Brand
>> category not found for brand: 100000630 category: dfCat100239
>>
>> And here¹s a log entry from the same server from last week sometime:
>>
>> 2013-12-01T23:00:00-07:00 atgprod1 local4: 23:00:00,103
>>atgprod1-prod_public_8080 atg-log INFO  [ProfileFormHandler] 1387361000
>>b678482057 bcs 
>>4C185612E4845821163BF0AEDAE745CE.atgprod1-prod_public_8080
>>/Store/account/login.jsp?locale=en_US&_DARGS=/Store/authModal/includes/mo
>>dalLoginForm.jsp.login-form&_=1385963950864 (http-0.0.0.0-8080-130) User
>>Œ[email protected]' attempted to log in, but failed.
>>
>> We run rsyslog with the ­x option on the remote servers.  This is how
>>we were also doing it with v4.  I tested removing that flag to enable
>>dns lookups and it didn¹t seem to make a difference for this issue.
>>
>> As I understand it, that info is coming from the header of the log
>>message and would be getting set on the client side?  Is that also going
>>to be something that is set by the application when it submits the log
>>or would the rsyslog client be inserting that?  My app guys are saying
>>that nothing has changed on their side so we really aren¹t sure what
>>could be causing this change.
>>
>> Any insight into what might be causing this would be really appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dan
>> _______________________________________________
>> rsyslog mailing list
>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
>> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
>> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
>> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a
>>myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST
>>if you DON'T LIKE THAT.

_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to