Looks absolutely sensible to me.

I would expand a bit on the initial idea of being very open. For example, I
would add that there were "over nine thousand" patches being sent and one
hand would be fine for counting the rejected ones. I'd also add some links
to how to contribute, the github project - again, to "show" the fact that
rsyslog is open to contributions. Even contributions that make other
contributions easier, like restructuring docs, automatically convert them
to/from RST, etc.

All that said, I think the general idea is clear, and it promotes the ASL
thing which I bet 99% are unaware of. And rsyslog's modularity, which also
is somewhat unclear to most, I believe.


2013/12/13 Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]>

> I tried to explain how easy it is to contribute.. but not sure if it looks
> more frightning than not saying anything. Please have a look and comment:
>
> http://www.rsyslog.com/contribution-policy/
>
> This is an experimental version of the policy and I will probably change
> the page during the day. Just be warned.
>
> Feedback very highly appreciated.
>
> Rainer
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad
> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
> DON'T LIKE THAT.
>
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to