On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]> wrote: > well, technically it's for sure possible, it's just another of these 24h > things. Technically, it's a question of interface, and insofar of which > types of modules. Obviously, these will be slower, and how slow is another > interface/effort question. > > Thinking about this, one could probably also claim the answer is "yes, you > can write OUTPUT modules in any language", it's just a doc issue. In fact, > omprog can be used as an interface here. It's actually not even a bad > interface... > > Again, something learned ;)
Probably the cheapest (implementation) "binding" for rsyslog would be a system() like call. Execute the subprogram with /bin/sh -c and communicate with structured messages on STDIO. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
