Rainier when you have time please submit, it's going to take a bit more
effort to understand where to submit patches, etc. and I'm currently off my
lunch break :)


On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Nick Syslog <[email protected]> wrote:

> I still need to GIT my legs for that :) (Unsure how to submit currently)
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>> Ahhh.. do you want to fix this and submit a patch via github? Else i can
>> do
>> that.  Many thanks in any case!
>> Rainer
>>
>> Sent from phone, thus brief.
>> Am 14.01.2014 17:36 schrieb "Nick Syslog" <[email protected]>:
>>
>> > in checking /etc/init.d/functions (thanks Chip) it was noted that "-t"
>> is
>> > not a valid option for killproc in RHEL, the correct syntax is "-d XX"
>> >
>> > I replaced the -t30 with -d 30 and it worked without incident. This also
>> > means that in current RHEL installations (and possibly Cent) that any
>> > script using -t will not work correctly or not obey the delay imposed.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Nick Syslog <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > I should rephrase and say "...after removing the -t30 OPTION",  not
>> line.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Nick Syslog <[email protected]
>> > >wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Comparing the init.d/rsyslog scripts between 7.4.7 and 7.4.8 I found:
>> > >>
>> > >> 7.4.7 (Line 51):
>> > >> killproc -p "$(PIDFILE)" $exec
>> > >>
>> > >> 7.4.8 (Line 51):
>> > >> killproc -p "$(PIDFILE)" -t30 $exec
>> > >>
>> > >> After removing the -t30 line I was able to see what I would consider
>> > >> "normal operation" (OK after both stopping and starting when issuing
>> > >> restart.) The issue when the -t30 is present and initiating a
>> restart is
>> > >> that the start appears to never occur due to the artificial wait.
>> > >>
>> > >> Manually starting and manually stopping had no issues.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Per the killproc manpage:
>> > >>
>> > >>        *-t<sec>*
>> > >>               The  number  *<sec>*  specifies  the  seconds to wait
>> > >>               between the sent signal *SIGTERM* and the  subsequen­
>> > >>               tially signal *SIGKILL* if the first *SIGTERM* does not
>> > >>               show any result within the first few milli seconds.
>> > >>               This defaults to *5* seconds.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Rainer Gerhards <
>> > >> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:40 PM, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> > I guess the question is what init scripts are you using to do
>> this.
>> > I'm
>> > >>> > not sure syslog maintains the scripts instead of the distro.
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> We actually cloned what the distro has, but in the longer term, we
>> need
>> > >>> to
>> > >>> maintain them ourselves -- at least as far as usual defaults (config
>> > >>> files)
>> > >>> etc are concerned. Right now, it's plainly taken from distro, but
>> maybe
>> > >>> we
>> > >>> missed an update ;)
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Rainer
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> > are you using the init scripts from the adiscon repository or from
>> > >>> > somewhere else?
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > David Lang
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Nick Syslog wrote:
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> >  Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:16:29 -0700
>> > >>> >> From: Nick Syslog <[email protected]>
>> > >>> >> Reply-To: rsyslog-users <[email protected]>
>> > >>> >> To: rsyslog-users <[email protected]>
>> > >>> >> Subject: [rsyslog] Service/Init issue in RHEL packages for
>> 7.4.8-1?
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> Has anyone else noticed that the service/init starts on version
>> > 7.4.8
>> > >>> >> typically don't obey standard protocol for starting and stopping
>> the
>> > >>> >> service?
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> Most often I use 'service rsyslog restart' and in my recent
>> cases in
>> > >>> >> development and elsewhere I am seeing that the service STOPS but
>> I
>> > >>> have to
>> > >>> >> manually execute a "service start rsyslog" after that command to
>> get
>> > >>> >> rsyslog to come online again.
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> I've also seen quirks where it will fail to stop or start at all
>> > >>> using the
>> > >>> >> init/service scripts.
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> Is this a known bug already or am I just unlucky?
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> Running RHEL 6.4 with rsyslog 7.4.8-1
>> > >>> >> _______________________________________________
>> > >>> >> rsyslog mailing list
>> > >>> >> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
>> > >>> >> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
>> > >>> >> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
>> > >>> >> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a
>> > >>> myriad
>> > >>> >> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST
>> if
>> > you
>> > >>> >> DON'T LIKE THAT.
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >>  _______________________________________________
>> > >>> > rsyslog mailing list
>> > >>> > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
>> > >>> > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
>> > >>> > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
>> > >>> > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a
>> > >>> myriad
>> > >>> > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if
>> > you
>> > >>> > DON'T LIKE THAT.
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> _______________________________________________
>> > >>> rsyslog mailing list
>> > >>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
>> > >>> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
>> > >>> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
>> > >>> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a
>> > myriad
>> > >>> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if
>> you
>> > >>> DON'T LIKE THAT.
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rsyslog mailing list
>> > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
>> > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
>> > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
>> > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad
>> > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
>> > DON'T LIKE THAT.
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> rsyslog mailing list
>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
>> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
>> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
>> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad
>> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
>> DON'T LIKE THAT.
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to