I think it might not be as hard to locate once the documentation is complete. We can work on including these scripts in the core documentation. That would make finding and using them far easier.
And capitalization noted. Will refer to it as Rsyslog from now on. :) -- James -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rainer Gerhards Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:42 AM To: rsyslog-users Subject: Re: [rsyslog] non-C output plugins On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Boylan, James <[email protected]>wrote: > Hmm. That's a tougher question. On the one hand I can see the benefit > to it. But on the other hand, is it the best choice for location... > One could argue that processing scripts like that should be in their > own repo since they are not directly linked to the Rsyslog codebase. > Yup (btw: "rsyslog" -- it should be all lower case - forgot to answer that in some thread...). Pro: * easier to maintain for it's developer * no need to involve rsyslog core team for updates Con: * (much?) harder to find for end user * harder to find out for the rsyslog team what actually exist * may provide lower "political" benefit (in regard of attracting contributors, visible contributor base, etc...). Some more? Other views? Rainer _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
