On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Nick Syslog <[email protected]> wrote:
> I haven't tested this yet, but is there any reason why IncludeConfig
> wouldn't work encapsulated within an ruleset () {} ?
>
>
Should work, as this is essentially a "text merge" tool.
Rainer
> I ask because I'm interested in segmenting out a few extremely large
> ruleset files I presently have into much smaller more manageable (for us)
> sub configs/rulesets.
>
> I'd assume this works but am not currently near my lab and I'd love to hear
> any caveats or challenges to this type of approach if anyone has any.
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad
> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
> DON'T LIKE THAT.
>
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE
THAT.
