On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Brad Davis <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 06:32:26PM +0100, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Todd Mortensen <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> > > When trying to build this package on ubuntu I am missing a new required
> > > package.
> > >
> > > configure:13363: error: Package requirements (libstdlog >= 1.0.0) were
> not
> > > met:
> > >
> > > I do not currently see a libstdlog package in ubuntu 12.04.  Can you
> > > please point me to the source of this new dependency ?
> > >
> >
> > It's a new component of liblogging:
> >
> > https://github.com/rsyslog/liblogging
> >
> > This is enabled by default, but rfc3195 no longer. If you need 3195 (you
> > know if you do!), use --enable-rfc3195 with ./configure.
> >
> > The current component is a shim, but will enable to redirect logging to
> the
> >
> > * syslog() call,
> > * journal
> > * unix socket directly (to circumvent the journal)
> >
> > and probably (later)
> > * udp direct
> > * file
> >
> > All of this via a driver interface. We will try to evangelize this to
> other
> > projects as well. It's a very slim component even in its end form. If
> > enough people begin to use it, we do not have any problem logging both on
> > systemd and non-systemd systems and we do not get into high performance
> > logging problems on journald systems as we can redirect to a non-journal
> > socket with this lib.
>
> Hi Rainer,
>
> Can you please update the README for this so we can build it?
>
>
Brad,

sorry, I get a bit lost in this thread. Which README update do you need?
rsyslog saying it needs the new component?

Rainer
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to