Hi, I also dislike "tarball-in-tarball". Thought that solution "a" was the preferred way: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.rsyslog/13314
If I remember correctly, only Brad (FreeBSD maintainer) voted for B. Would be nice to know if he still prefers tarball-in-tarball or not. @ Brad: Isn't it possible to provide multiple sources per port in *BSD like we do in Gentoo? See the nginx port <https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/blob/master/www/nginx/Makefile> ... it is pulling in multiple distfiles... so this should also work for rsyslog, not? If you agree, I think we could go with A... split docs in an own package and provide two tarballs (rsyslog source and docs) but no "tarball-in-tarball". Thoughts? -- Regards, Thomas _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
