On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Marc Fournier wrote:
Excerpts from Rainer Gerhards's message of 2014-07-11 13:14:15 +0200:Pls provide full config.Yes, sorry, here they are. Both the initial one which definetely blocks openldap, and the second one, which I'm not sure about because of the main Q thread in "uninterruptible sleep". Meanwhile, during a diskfull where a node got ejected out of the load balancer pool, I noticed some openldap threads which were sleeping with "unix_wait_for_peer" in ps's WCHAN column (something I didn't notice before sending my previous email). This was on a node which still had the initial configuration.
action queues only apply to the next action listed so you have an action queue for *.* @@logserver:514;RSYSLOG_ForwardFormat and auth,authpriv.* /var/log/secure everything else is handled by the main queue.what version of rsyslog are you running? there are significant performance improvements in recent versions compared to v5 that is stock on many distros
Having no actions as part of the main queue is actually a problem, rsyslog ends up moving the messages very inefficently (one at a time instead of in batches)
David Lang
rsyslog.conf-initial-setup
Description: Binary data
rsyslog.conf-with-action-queues
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
_______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
