On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Cristian Falcas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > I see that the syslogtag parameter sent by rsyslogd in syslog is in this > format: > > rsyslogd-2359: > > Is this configurable? no, not yet ;) > Can I set it to be like the other normal programs: > rsyslogd[2359]? > > be careful. 2359 is not the process ID but rather the error number that goes along with this message. This is actually why the format is like it is: it's a tag value that describes an error. > I would like to have the same programname for collecting remote logs. > > We could think about removing the error part, as a global option. Same for adding process ID. but this needs to be implemented. Not a bit deal, proabably. Rainer > Best regards, > Cristian Falcas > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > DON'T LIKE THAT. > _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
