On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:49 PM, bodik <[email protected]> wrote: > we have no problem with ASL2.0 > > if you merge our proposal please use the latest version from > > > http://home.zcu.cz/~bodik/metasw/rsyslog2/metapatches/tcpsrv-peeraddr-logging1.patch > > which has just cosmetic difference ("NA" vs "N/A") > > do you have actual cases where this happens? I ask because this would be a bug that needs different addressing. The property needs to be set at that point of processing.
Thanks, Rainer _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
