2014-11-04 19:10 GMT+01:00 David Lang <[email protected]>: > On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Rainer Gerhards wrote: > > 2014-10-31 0:29 GMT+01:00 David Lang <[email protected]>: >> >> On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Thomas D. wrote: >>> >>> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:08:22 +0100 >>> >>>> >>>> Are there any important missing features in the pipeline? >>>> >>>> >>> important to who? There is a years-long backlog of little features that >>> will be incredibly useful to people, plus ongoing work on the feature of >>> performance that never ends. >>> >>> When Debian Jessie is out, things are done for a moment. I am not >>> >>>> suggesting to stop further development at all, but we should focus for >>>> 3-6 months on a test suite (and remember, the test suite will only >>>> uncover bugs, and I am expecting to find a lot of bugs). >>>> >>>> There are dozen of modules. Most of them were created to solve one >>>> special problem. But many of them are lacking of the modern syntax and >>>> or documentation. Often they don't even work. >>>> >>>> >>> The issue is the split between core and contributed code. The core code >>> has pretty good test coverage and fair documentation. The Contributed >>> modules are in much worse shape. It doesn't help that there is no good >>> deliniation between the two. >>> >>> >> I could split the contributed ones off to a separate directory tree. The >> drawback is that the way git and (thus github and others) work we loose >> easy to follow commit history for those moved files. That's the prime >> reason I have not done it so far. >> > > git should be able to follow file moves across directories. It doesn't > show up in the diff as a move unless you add -m to the diffstats lines, but > git blame, etc will follow the history. > > kind of... at least what I have seen in the past, it looked quite hard to follow the actual history, at least via the graphical interface. They have some reference, but you need to go to the other places. In any case, I'll have a look when I am done with test vm setups...
Rainer > David Lang > > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > DON'T LIKE THAT. > _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
