It's going to be in the coming release, just master build for now. -- Regards, Janmejay
PS: Please blame the typos in this mail on my phone's uncivilized soft keyboard sporting it's not-so-smart-assist technology. On Feb 6, 2015 6:37 AM, "David Lang" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, singh.janmejay wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:22 PM, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, singh.janmejay wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 7:17 AM, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Field type 'descent' does this, but not exactly in the same way. >>>> >>>> >>> does it? I understood it to just be calling another ruleset on the whole >>> line (doc problem again) >>> >>> >> It allows field to identify how remaining-text should be returned, which >> allows it to be parsed by remaining part of the rule which the field >> belongs to. >> >> Here is a test which uses something similar to what you are trying to do: >> https://github.com/rsyslog/liblognorm/blob/master/tests/ >> field_tokenized_recursive.sh#L41 >> >> (check 41 to EOF) >> > > This looks like it may do this, but it looks like it's not in the release > yet. I'll have to compile from scratch. > > David Lang > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > DON'T LIKE THAT. > _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
