Update: it looks pretty easy to integrate a choice of "canned parser" vs.
"regular parser chain". I'll craft a patch and will submit so that you can
test. Probably tomorrow.

Rainer

2015-03-03 17:41 GMT+01:00 Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]>:

>
> 2015-03-03 16:42 GMT+01:00 Thomas D. <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> quick update: Yes, the "problem" is related to util-linux which now
>> defaults
>> to rfc5424 [1].
>>
>> I downgraded to util-linux-2.25.2 and the test is passing...
>>
>> The right "solution" seems to be to use "--rfc3164" for current util-linux
>> packages in the test until rsyslog does support rfc5424.
>>
>> Final question: Does the new default RFC5424 support in util-linux cause
>> any
>> harm to rsyslog because rsyslog is not RFC5424 ready like you (Rainer)
>> wrote
>> in your last mail or was it a misunderstanding (and it is just the test
>> which is expecting rfc3164 instead of rfc5424)?
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/util-linux-ng/msg09816.html
>>
>>
> I just saw this when I wanted to check on the format:
>
> "Protocols are meaningful only when messages are sent to remote syslog
> server."
>
> MAybe the change in logger is not intentional (for the local socket)?
>
> Rainer
>
>> -Thomas
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rsyslog mailing list
>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
>> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
>> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
>> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad
>> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
>> DON'T LIKE THAT.
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to