Hi, singh.janmejay wrote: > Well, we can fix it to allow -j<n>. In this case its easy because no > global resources are involved. But in case of rsyslog tests it will be > slightly harder (as listening port is involved). But that is where it > matters more because this test-suite is fairly small :-).
In the long way, this would be perfect. Restricting "make check" to "-j1" isn't a problem for liblognorm at the moment, but for rsyslog it "hurts" performance because building the test apps is limited, too. For PowerDNS I have rewritten the testsuite in the past (https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/pull/2230) to allow parallel build using parallel test harness. But I am not sure if we can do the same for rsyslog. If we need to specify dependencies for each test, this would be a lot. And every time you add a new test, you would have to update the dependencies for each previous test, too. Not sure if there's a better way to handle that. -Thomas _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
