On Fri, 29 May 2015, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
2015-05-29 13:53 GMT+02:00 singh.janmejay <[email protected]>:
Should we have an optional argument in word: except.
Eg.
%foo:word:&%%bar:word%
Given baz&quux will give us:
{"foo" : "baz", "bar": "quux"}
If we take multiple chars (allow escaped unicode sequences), we can
say the default value of this field is 'space' and 'tab'.
isn't that char-to? At least that was what I added char-to for...
almost, except char-to (and char-sep) don't allow you to specify multiple
characters as the end of the item.
char-sep will fail if you have
a&b c
and do %foo:tokenize:%:char-sep:&% c
David Lang
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE
THAT.
