2015-08-21 13:48 GMT+02:00 Thomas D. <[email protected]>:
> Hi,
>
> Rainer Gerhards wrote:
>>> Well, liblognorm-1.1.1 to 1.1.2 is a *minor* bump according to the
>>> version number.
>>
>> Well, we (rsyslog project) still use the "rsyslog traditional
>> versioning scheme" for this version of liblognorm, and this means
>> 1.1.2 was just not yet ready for 1.2, because all 1.1 goals were not
>> reached. It doesn't mean its a bugfixing relaese only. That's of
>> course different from your expectation, but no point in arguing on it
>> -- that's how it is. In v2, we can change that, and will probably move
>> to the new rsyslog scheme (a new release every 6 weeks with
>> incrementing x version (as in 2.x.y)).
>
> OK, we have applied a mask for liblognorm-1.1.2.
>
> Would be nice if you could ping me just *before* liblognorm-2 release so
> I can verify proper SONAMEs... Thanks!

You can already check this here:
   
https://github.com/rsyslog/liblognorm/blob/v2-experimental/src/Makefile.am#L50

Reason is an API change:
    https://github.com/rsyslog/liblognorm/blob/v2-experimental/compatibility-v2

also note this github discussion:
    https://github.com/rsyslog/liblognorm/issues/126

Rainer
PS: v2-experimental will become the new master very soon.

>
>
> -Thomas
>
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
> sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T 
> LIKE THAT.
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to