2015-11-24 9:18 GMT+01:00 David Lang <[email protected]>: > On Tue, 24 Nov 2015, Ciprian Hacman wrote: > >> I was actually thinking of creating a PR for accepting " " instead of "T" >> between date and time. >> @Rainer: Would it be ok? > > > my reaction is that it depends on how paranoid the rest of the code is. Is > there any chance that this will cause it to misinterpret something else as a > match?
No, but the current stance of the IETF is "if it's malformed, than it's dangerous". I think that paradigm is correct to follow these days. An option would work, but the default should be to comply with RFC rules. Rainer > > David Lang > > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of > sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T > LIKE THAT. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
