On Mon, 25 Jan 2016, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
2016-01-25 15:02 GMT+01:00 Thomas D. <[email protected]>:
Hi,
very good idea!
My x86 and x64 build cluster finished without any problems:
============================================================================
Testsuite summary for rsyslog 8.16.0
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 182
# PASS: 174
# SKIP: 8
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL: 0
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
For future please also release the doc tarball.
I am not sure about the URL/filename. If we would detect a breakage
would we skip the intended version (i.e. 8.16.0 in this case) and
release 8.16.1 instead? Then it would be fine...
I think I see your point. So future candidates should go into a dedicated
directory. I think that should solve all issues, right?
With the next release, I'll see that I can get the tarball candidate
(including doc) up by Monday morning, or maybe even Friday into a dedicated
directory.
Does that address your needs?
not quite, if someone compiles from this and installs the package to test, then
a fixed release is made, the packages are going to have the same name.
Thomas, does the debian infrastructure understand vX-pre or vX-alpha or
something like that as being a special case to sort before vX in it's version
comparisons? I seem to remember seeing some discussion of such a feature.
David Lang
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE
THAT.
