Yes, makes sense, but is far too much work for me now. Looking forward to a contribution.
Rainer Sent from phone, thus brief. Am 28.03.2016 22:07 schrieb "singh.janmejay" <[email protected]>: > Makes sense. > > We probably don't even need to go as far as compiling. If we haven't tuned > it in significant amount of time, we'll likely have big wins if we just > invest in most significant PGOs. > > Compile to C will be hard, because it'll then require compiler and linker. > Many environments will have policies around not having compiler or linker > installed on production env. > On Mar 29, 2016 12:36 AM, "Peter Portante" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 2:15 PM, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Templates are static constructs, but when they are used, they are > > > essentially interpreted each time they are accessed. > > > > > > A few years ago we introduced the idea that templates could be > hard-coded > > > in C (the built-in templates were done this way, and string modules > were > > > introduced to allow for further cusomizations). This was enough of an > > > improvement to result in a 10%+ improvement in total throughput. > > > > > > I'm wondering if it would make sense to try and 'compile' a template > down > > > to C (or something extremely efficient to process) at startup time > rather > > > than going to hand-coded string modules. > > > > > > thoughts? > > > > > > FWIW, I'd be in favor of doing that. Great idea. > > > > -peter > > > > > > > > > > > > > David Lang > > > _______________________________________________ > > > rsyslog mailing list > > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > > > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > > > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a > myriad > > > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > > > DON'T LIKE THAT. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rsyslog mailing list > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad > > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > > DON'T LIKE THAT. > > > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > DON'T LIKE THAT. > _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
