At this point I have things working. I found that in some cases I had logic errors where the variable being used in the update did not exist, or was otherwise not a valid json tag (spaces, etc)

David Lang

On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, singh.janmejay wrote:

Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 23:04:48 +0530
From: singh.janmejay <[email protected]>
Reply-To: rsyslog-users <[email protected]>
To: rsyslog-users <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [rsyslog] dynastats problems with user defined variables?

David,

Did a few runs with those lines present / commented out with
rsyslog-master. I see no difference in either on-cpu or off-cpu
performance. The left-hand-side is with edge-relay and core-relay
lines being active, and the right-side has them commented out. Here is
the cpu profile:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_XhUZLNFT4dWDFOZlB6VW1hc0E
The hypercall on top is cpu-idle call. This was on a c1.4large box on ec2.

Both were on the same version of Rsyslog (built off master). I'll do
another round of tests with the version I run on production (which is
patched fork of 8.12, afair) to identify any large change in cpu
profile.

This is a much more simplified version of config though. I extracted
valid (non garbled) json messages from debug log(got 9089 lines) and
pumped them in 100 times using tcpflood.

tcpflood call was timed, it took between 19.7 - 20.5 seconds for each
run regardless of edge and core relay counters being incremented. It
was ~ 45k / sec (but again, neither the load profile, not the machine
is not exactly like yours), so its not apples to apples.


On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 12:15 PM, singh.janmejay
<[email protected]> wrote:
It doesn't treat them any different. It takes the key and puts it in a
hash-table and set an accumulator as its value. Then it'll look it up
every time you ask it to increment the counter followed by actual
increment. That is about it.

The only way I can foresee the contents affecting its behavior is the
hash-fn takes more CPU time when given a large string. But that should
be on-cpu and not off-cpu time.

Today im working on a getting an Rsyslog build running with config
into which I inject messages from your debug-log (i'll extract
messages and tcpflood them in) and try to understand why it behaves
different between those lines commented out or not.

If I fail to reproduce it in this simple setup, we'll have to track
backtraces that are taking Rsyslog off-cpu in your environment.

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 12:57 AM, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote:
doing a little more digging (and some accidental stuff), is it possible that
it's running into grief if the contents of the variable are not a simple
word (spaces or other funny characters in the value)?

David Lang

On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, singh.janmejay wrote:

Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 01:07:49 +0530

From: singh.janmejay <[email protected]>
Reply-To: rsyslog-users <[email protected]>
To: rsyslog-users <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [rsyslog] dynastats problems with user defined variables?

Yep, it looked like that. Its interesting though, its 100% off CPU
(very unique).

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 1:02 AM, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote:

Yes, the first one is with the user variables commented out, exactly what
I
pasted in from the grep.

the second is enabling the dyn_inc for edge relays.

David Lang

On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, singh.janmejay wrote:

Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:51:18 +0530
From: singh.janmejay <[email protected]>
Reply-To: rsyslog-users <[email protected]>
To: rsyslog-users <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [rsyslog] dynastats problems with user defined variables?

You meant the first one was with "commented out" version right? (you
said uncommenting edge_relay, so double-checking).

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:38 AM, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote:


here is vmstat 1 running

# vmstat 1
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system--
------cpu-----
 r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in   cs us sy
id
wa st
 2  0  62280 2363804    584 27280376    0    1    21   596    0    1 46
3
51  0 0
 1  0  62280 2349476    584 27280612    0    0     0 87042  979  891  4
0
95  0 0
 1  0  62280 2330488    584 27280908    0    0     0     0  388  258  4
0
96  0 0
 1  0  62280 2314744    584 27281148    0    0     0     0  396  255  4
0
96  0 0
 1  0  62280 2297736    584 27281388    0    0     0     0  376  245  4
0
96  0 0
 2  0  62280 2546260    584 27245272    0    0     0     4  639  568  6
1
94  0 0
 2  0  62280 2464300    584 27245928    0    0     0  1716  936 1146  8
0
91  0 0
 2  0  62280 2394452    584 27246444    0    0     0     8  687  333  8
0
92  0 0


here is vmstat 1 uncommenting edge_relay

# vmstat 1
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system--
------cpu-----
 r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in   cs us sy
id
wa st
 1  0  62280 3198672    584 26770624    0    1    21   596    0    1 46
3
51  0 0
 0  0  62280 3198904    584 26770664    0    0     0     0  151  247  0
0
100 0  0
 0  0  62280 3200332    584 26770664    0    0     0     0  128  233  0
0
100 0  0
 0  0  62280 3202244    584 26770664    0    0     0     4  172  315  0
0
100 0  0
 0  0  62280 3203132    584 26770664    0    0     0     0  132  218  0
0
100 0  0
 0  0  62280 3203912    584 26770668    0    0     0     8  203  347  0
0
100 0  0


things just are not running with it uncommented.

I'm going to send you my config directly, it is a very heavy config.

David Lang



On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, singh.janmejay wrote:

On my cluster, each node (those 66 nodes) have 4 threads for ruleset
(it does everything, lognorm based parsing, lookups using loopup
table, re_extract, string concat, several if-else based conditions and
queues up for egress using omkafka and I generally see 3 being
utilized). This setup runs at ~37k msg/s (2.5M / 66 = 37k).

300k/Min is still 5k/s which should be doable on a single-thd (unless
your ruleset is much heavier than mine). Im thinking for a
equivalently complex ruleset 37k / 4  = 9k should be achievable.

I'll try to reproduce this. Can you share out the exact commit-id you
are working with?

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:38 PM, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote:



On Tue, 22 Mar 2016, singh.janmejay wrote:

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:01 AM, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote:




I added this to my configs

# grep -B 1 -A 1 dyn_ /etc/rsyslog.conf
# custom stats to track in rsyslog
dyn_stats(name="msgs_per_host" resettable="on"
maxCardinality="3000"
unusedMetricLife="1200")
dyn_stats(name="msgs_per_edge_relay" resettable="on"
maxCardinality="3000"
unusedMetricLife="1200")
dyn_stats(name="msgs_per_core_relay" resettable="on"
maxCardinality="3000"
unusedMetricLife="1200")
dyn_stats(name="msgs_per_program" resettable="on"
maxCardinality="3000"
unusedMetricLife="1200")
dyn_stats(name="msgs_per_tag" resettable="on" maxCardinality="3000"
unusedMetricLife="1200")

--
  /var/log/sources-messages;sources
  set $.inc = dyn_inc("msgs_per_host", $hostname);
  set $.inc = dyn_inc("msgs_per_program", $programname);
#  if $!trusted!edge!relay != "" then {
#    set $.inc = dyn_inc("msgs_per_edge_relay",
$!trusted!edge!relay);
#  }
#  if $!trusted!core!relay != "" then {
#    set $.inc = dyn_inc("msgs_per_edge_relay",
$!trusted!core!relay);
#  }
--
    }
    #set $.inc = dyn_inc("msgs_per_tag", $.custommessage);
    /var/log/messages-tags;manual

if I uncomment any of the lines that refer to $! or $. variables,
rsyslog
basically stops processing messages (a few messages seem to be
processed
in
spurts, bit a lot of processing never happens)

any chance that this has problems with locking around user defined
variables?





Not sure, I run it in production (66 6-cpu(HT) haswell VMs handling
an
aggregate of ~2.5 M-msg / sec (~1.5kB each)) and haven't seen such
jitters, but then I don't use 3 level deep keys either and in my
case,
the feature is backported to 8.12 branch), so still uses json-c (not
libfastjson). I do use it with user-defined variables too, just not
nested as deep.

We don't treat variables differently after dereferencing them in the
top-most layer handling rainerscript fn-calls, so $hostname and
$!x!y!z, as far as any rainerscript fn invocation is considered, are
the same (performance-wise) except for the top-level dereference
(outside of fn-impl-body).

Some more info may come handy in reproducing it:
- What is the message throughput (in msg/s) and what is the avg msg
size?





with these commented out as above, ~50k messages/min normal, ~200K
message/min if I'm replaying queued logs (box saturated, see the
other
thread where 8.17 final seems to have slowed down from ~300K
messages/min
that I was getting with a 8.16+ git)

- Do you see messages being written to sources-messages file, while
they don't get written to messages-tags file?





Yes, but not all messages. I have an alarm that goes off if
sources-messages
isn't written to in two 35 second checks (70 seconds total), that
alarm
never fired. But there would be a burst of messages show up in
sources-messages and then 20 or so seconds before another burst would
show
up.

- Do you see a significant jump in voluntary context switches(say
per
10 seconds or even per second) when you uncomment those lines? How
big
is the jump?
- How does the observation change if you replace it with this kind
of
variable access pattern:

set $.x = $!trusted!edge!relay;
if $.x != "" then {
 set $.inc = dyn_inc("msgs_per_edge_relay", $.x);
}





will check.

- Is this stock 8.17 build?





stock config, but against git as of yesterday. I needed to get
liblognorm
2.0 and the current libjsonfast

- Is this x86-64 Linux? What distro (and version)?





ubuntu trusty (14.04) 64 bit.


Also, the documentation doesn't say why we are setting $.inc to the
result
of the command, what does $.inc contain after the command is run?
from
the
documentation, it looks like it contains an error code (at least
the
way
it's used is similar to error code returns in other languages), but
I
don't
see what the errors are in the doc page.





Yes, it is the error-code. It has value 0 when successful, an
non-zero
when it fails to increment (it may fail due to maxCardinality being
hit or due to a contended for lock etc (it doesn't wait for the
lock,
it uses try-lock and doesn't increment the counter if it can't get a
shared-lock over the bucket).





While I do have multiple threads running on the main queue, the
places
I
am
calling this are on action queues with only one worker, so the only
lock
conflict should be when the data is reported.

These are rsyslog error-codes. It does an error pass-thru.

I'll add this to documentation (didn't know this was missed).





Thanks.

Sorry I didn't get a chance to run this pre-release, this is exactly
why
I
try to use features like this pre-release to spot the things that the
person
developign them misses because they are too close to the problem. :-)


David Lang
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a
myriad
of
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
DON'T
LIKE THAT.







_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a
myriad
of
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
DON'T
LIKE THAT.






_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad
of
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T
LIKE THAT.





_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T
LIKE THAT.



--
Regards,
Janmejay
http://codehunk.wordpress.com




_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to