What is broken? Honest question, i am not aware of any issue in this regard. The current system imho works with the provided versions.
Sent from phone, thus brief. Am 24.05.2016 16:52 schrieb "Christopher Racky" <[email protected] >: > Hello, > I would also prefer to have a release Version of libfastjson together > with liblognormv2 and rsyslog. > For my opinion this should be the most common usecase. > Even this are 2 different packages the most users would use both of > them from production perspective. > > The current situtation is broken and I strongly support to leave this > broken situtation as fast as possible, even if the Version is not > Feature-complete. > Usually it's not a big thing to wait a little longer for a release > (even Feature requirements can be a big Driver). But from production > point of view a stable situtation without broken compatibilities is > much more worth for me. > > best regards, > Chris > > 2016-05-24 14:11 GMT+02:00 Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]>: > > 2016-05-24 13:06 GMT+02:00 Thomas D. <[email protected]>: > >> Hi, > >> > >> if it is not ready, don't release it. > >> > >> If you think that this release is important for the next rsyslog release > >> (i.e. the rsyslog master already contains changes which require current > >> libfastjson master so you would have to revert code from rsyslog just > for > >> the planned release) > > > > no, that's no problem at all > > > > feel free to delay the rsyslog release too when you > >> know you only need 1-2 more weeks: That's what I was talking about when > >> proposing the current release scheme... the 6 weeks aren't carved in > stone. > >> > >> It should _help_ you by removing stress like "Oh, I don't get this into > the > >> upcoming release but I don't have to worry because the next release is > >> already in sight" and not "Oh, if I don't get this done by date we will > have > >> to wait 6 more weeks..." > > > > Well... some folks wait since quite a while on liblognorm v2. It can > > work with the libfastjson version that we now have. It is just not as > > good as I had hoped it were at this point. And it is not tested as > > well as I had hoped for (but still pretty good, e.g. the daily build > > packages include everything since at least one month). > > > > Hope that clarifies and thanks for the comments. I think I'll postpone > > if nobody says he would really like to have it with next weeks release > > (holding rsyslog for that reason I think makes no sense, especially as > > we have some good patches inside the version). > > > > Thanks again Peter and Thomas, > > Rainer > > > > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> Thomas > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> rsyslog mailing list > >> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > >> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > >> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > >> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a > myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if > you DON'T LIKE THAT. > > _______________________________________________ > > rsyslog mailing list > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > DON'T LIKE THAT. > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > DON'T LIKE THAT. > _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
