On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, Rainer Gerhards wrote:


I assume we're all aware that the lack of Ubuntu package (provided by
Adiscon or someone else, doesn't really matter) is a major barrier in
rsyslog adoption. So I'm thinking that even a ugly/crazy solution
would do, as long as we end up with (reliable) packages. So I think it
would be nice to have all the information needed for anyone to chime
in with ideas and possible solutions. Unless that information is
already somewhere and I missed it... in which case excuse my ignorance
:-S

I fully agree it would be good to fix this, I just honestly don't know
how. And I unfortunately have no time budget left to spend another two
weeks on it. I think to do it right, I would need to learn Ubuntu
packaging from the roots, and that's beyond my current time budget.
:-(

The problem is somewhere in the rsyslog-pkg-ubuntu project, and
related to this script

https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog-pkg-ubuntu/blob/master/scripts/auto_daily_project.sh

and the associated control files.

I didn't have time to do my own compiles this development cycle, but I am also seeing failures building locally using this script/process.

investigating now.

David Lang
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to