What did happen to the "new documentation format" effort?
I think wiki could be fair enough, but I don't know how it will behave for old-releases. If I'm not wrong, current system allow to have different documentation pages according to each version, so perhaps it worths keep it.
On the other hand, markdown is more friendly than....whatever is that. :P El 23/11/16 a las 20:57, Rainer Gerhards escribió:
Hi all, especially histology, I wonder if it would make sense to document coding concepts on the github wiki - or is files better? Based on other discussions today, I think it would make sense to write up a little bit more for potential contributors (lowering the energy barrier). What do you think? Rainer _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
_______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
