I've recently converted all of our nodes from forwarding messages from the default forwarding format to using the 'RSYSLOG_SyslogProtocol23Format' format.

I only did light research beforehand (so I can only blame myself), but when our relay nodes log in either 'RSYSLOG_TraditionalFileFormat' or 'RSYSLOG_FileFormat' the process name is recorded in the log file(s). When we forward messages using the default forwarding format, that information seems to come across as expected. When our client nodes forward using the 'RSYSLOG_SyslogProtocol23Format' format the process name information is "lost" and not recorded within the local log files on our receiver.



* rsyslog 8.28.0
* Ubuntu 16.04
* using official PPA
* Postfix mail relay node
* sending in 'RSYSLOG_SyslogProtocol23Format' format via RELP
* recording locally in 'RSYSLOG_FileFormat' format
* local messages appear to retain 'postfix/smtpd[9999]' format (which is desired)


* rsyslog 8.28.0
* Ubuntu 16.04
* using official PPA
* receiving via RELP
* recording locally in 'RSYSLOG_FileFormat' format
* messages saved appear to no longer retain the process name (e.g., 'postfix[9999]')

Turning to Google, I found this[1] bug report which explained the problem much better than I ever could. I later found another thread[2] where the problem was discussed, but no resolution reached. The final post to that thread[4] illustrated that the syslogtag value is coming across with the values needed in the syslogtag field, but both programname and app-name properties were missing the Postfix component/process name information.

Is there a way to subsclass or inherit the RSYSLOG_FileFormat template and override the value it uses for app-name? I don't know what I am doing in that regarding, but I'm willing to learn. I'd really like to preserve the Postfix process name in the log messages saved on our receiver node.

In absence of the understanding necessary to override the existing template, one workaround I'm considering is having our client nodes check the facility before forwarding messages on to the central receiver. If the facility is 'mail', send using traditional forwarding format, otherwise send everything else using the newer forwarding format. I'd rather have precision timestamps on both, but having the process name available in the mail logs is more important in our use case.

Thank you in advance for your help!


[1] https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/issues/168

[2] http://kb.monitorware.com/app-name-programname-t12945.html

[3] http://kb.monitorware.com/post27055.html#p27055

[4] http://kb.monitorware.com/post27061.html#p27061

[5] http://www.rsyslog.com/doc/v8-stable/configuration/templates.html
rsyslog mailing list
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 

Reply via email to