Hi,

The changes to the description are clear, no ambiguity now. It is also inline 
with the text provided for Facility and Severity.

I vote for it.

Warm Regards
Lak.
________________________________
From: rsyslog <rsyslog-boun...@lists.adiscon.com> on behalf of deoren 
<rsyslog-users-lists.adiscon....@whyaskwhy.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 2:50 PM
To: rsyslog@lists.adiscon.com
Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Question regarding imfile Input Parameters

What do you think of these potential changes to the description?

https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog-doc/pull/584/files

Does that make the coverage any clearer, or worse?

On 2/21/2018 3:20 AM, putcha narayana via rsyslog wrote:
> Thank you David Lang for a quick response.
>
> Appreciate it.
>
> Lak.
> ________________________________
> From: David Lang <da...@lang.hm>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 8:47 AM
> To: putcha narayana via rsyslog
> Cc: putcha narayana
> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Question regarding imfile Input Parameters
>
> imfile assumes that everything in the file is the message content, no tag, no
> facility, no severity.
>
> so the tag, facility and severity need to be set, whatever you set gets 
> applied
> to every line
>
> David Lang
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to