IIRC jgerhards had some Java stack traces send this way and thus he crafted
that experimental code. Afaik it works at least for that use case.

Rainer

Sent from phone, thus brief.

David Lang <[email protected]> schrieb am Di., 8. Mai 2018, 22:24:

> On Tue, 8 May 2018, Michael Lopez wrote:
>
> > The issue I had in syslogng and which ultimately will be the same issue
> in
> > rsyslog is when receiving the packet with multiple messages the first
> > message would have a header and the second would not. So what happened is
> > the first message would go to the assigned hostname file but the second
> > message would go to the syslogng server hostname and this is why I was
> > regexing at the network input.
>
> rsyslog works a bit differently, it would have the sending machine's
> hostname/IP
> (unless the second line sent looks enough like a log that it thinks part
> of it
> is a hostname)
>
> But let's back up a step, what is it that is generating these multi-line
> logs.
> Can we fix them at the source so they don't cause grief.
>
> This is the first time I've heard of this particular problem, and while
> you can
> apply a custom parser to the TCP input, I don't think it will let you
> combine
> multiple lines into one log message.
>
> David Lang
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad
> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
> DON'T LIKE THAT.
>
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to