It's most useful when you get multiple log messages per microseond as a way
of ordering them as you can do with multiple cpu cores generating log
traffic simultaneously.

On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 12:47 PM David Lang <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think it would be a resonable extension  to rfc5424 to allow it's parser
> to
> accept more digits in the timestamp.
>
> I'm not sure that digits beyond microseconds really represent valid time,
> but I
> don't think it's a big deal to support it.
>
> David Lang
>
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, Peter Viskup via rsyslog wrote:
>
> > It might be possible to extend the rfc3339 time format to rfc3339nano,
> > but that will break rfc5424 which allow up to microseconds precision
> > only. Similar already in use when rfc3164 syslog messages used with
> > rfc3339 timestamps.
> >
> >
> https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/search?p=1&q=date-rfc3339&unscoped_q=date-rfc3339
> >
> https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/search?q=formatTimestamp3339&unscoped_q=formatTimestamp3339
> >
> https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/search?q=tplFmtRFC3339Date&unscoped_q=tplFmtRFC3339Date
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5424
> >
> > Consider opening github request for the implementation.
> >
> > Peter
> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:43 PM Jason Nordwick <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is there a way to get nanoseconds in and out of rsyslog? I'm using
> >> dateformat rfc3339, and it works find for micros, but at nanos, the
> >> timestamp gets correupted:
> >>
> >> property(name="timereported" dateFormat="rfc3339")
> >>
> >> Also, when writing out json formatted fields, is there a way to print
> out a
> >> numeric property? I would like to make syslogseverity a number, but I
> have
> >> been unsuccessful in creating a numeric json field. My workaround is to
> >> handcraft the entire json payload instead of using the jsonf option  on
> the
> >> template.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Jason
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rsyslog mailing list
> >> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> >> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> >> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> >> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a
> myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if
> you DON'T LIKE THAT.
> > _______________________________________________
> > rsyslog mailing list
> > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad
> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
> DON'T LIKE THAT.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad
> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
> DON'T LIKE THAT.
>
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to