Is there a page that maps legacy statements to the new version? Why do I ask? * My search on rsyslog.com for PrivDropToUser give me this link: https://www.rsyslog.com/doc/v7-stable/search.html?q=PrivDropToUser+&check_keywords=yes&area=default and clicking on the Dropping privileges in rsyslog link gave an Invalid file specified :( https://www.rsyslog.com/doc/v7-stable/configuration/droppriv.rst.html?highlight=privdroptouser
* The first page of google for Dynafilecachesize gives me this: https://www.rsyslog.com/doc/v7-stable/configuration/action/rsconf1_dynafilecachesize.html > -----Original Message----- > From: Rainer Gerhards [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, November 09, 2018 10:17 AM > To: LOEWENTHAL Sophie > Cc: rsyslog-users; David Lang > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Code verification : legacy to new format > > El vie., 9 nov. 2018 a las 10:07, > [email protected] > (<[email protected]>) escribió: > > > > Thanks Rainer for the details. > > > > Thus these statements should be replaced with something from the 'basic' or > 'advanced' format > > > > $umask 0000 > > $CreateDirs on > > $fileOwner rsyslog > > $fileGroup uxadmin > > $dirGroup uxadmin > > $FileCreateMode 0660 > > $DynaFileCacheSize 600 > > $PrivDropToUser rsyslog > > $PrivDropToGroup rsyslog > > > I think so. Sadly for some there may still be no new-style equivalent. > We have focused on those that are critical, e.g. easy to mistake (like > DynaFileCache, which means folks think to be a global statement). Some > of the real global ones may not be converted yet as we never stumbled > over them. If you find some, it would be great to open a github issue. > > Rainer > > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > Sophie > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Rainer Gerhards [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Friday, November 09, 2018 9:45 AM > > > To: rsyslog-users > > > Cc: David Lang; LOEWENTHAL Sophie > > > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Code verification : legacy to new format > > > > > > https://www.rsyslog.com/doc/v8-stable/configuration/conf_formats.html > > > > > > HTH > > > Rainer > > > El vie., 9 nov. 2018 a las 9:30, sophie.loewenthal--- via rsyslog > > > (<[email protected]>) escribió: > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: David Lang [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2018 10:30 PM > > > > > To: sophie.loewenthal--- via rsyslog > > > > > Cc: LOEWENTHAL Sophie > > > > > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Code verification : legacy to new format > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 8 Nov 2018, sophie.loewenthal--- via rsyslog wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > This seems to work for me, but I'd be grateful if somebody would > confirm > > > this > > > > > is actually correct. > > > > > > Dump all nrpe messages into a file, and once done discard. > > > > > > > > > > > > * Legacy format > > > > > > :programname, isequal, "nrpe" /app/rsyslog/messages.nrpe.all > > > > > > :programname, isequal, "nrpe" & > > > > > > > > > > > > * New format > > > > > > if ( $programname == "nrpe" ) then { > > > > > > action(type="omfile" file="/app/rsyslog/messages.nrpe.all" > > > > > flushOnTXEnd="off") > > > > > > stop > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > This works, but I'll point out that the following also works > > > > > > > > > > if ( $programname == "nrpe" ) then { > > > > > /app/rsyslog/messages.nrpe.all > > > > > stop > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > you don't have to switch everything to use action(), the general > > > > > recommendation > > > > > is taht if it's a single line in the legacy format, and it's at least > > > > > as clear > > > > > as the new format, go ahead and use the legacy format. > > > > > > > > > > It's when you have things that are multiple lines of config in the old > format > > > > > (setting lots of $foo lines and then having the line that they > > > > > affect) that > the > > > > > old format becomes confusing and you should switch to the new format. > > > There > > > > > are > > > > > also new features available in the action() syntax, but if the old > > > > > format > does > > > > > what you want, you aren't using the new feature :-) > > > > > > > > > > David Lang > > > > > > > > Hi David, > > > > I presumed incorrectly that the legacy format was deprecated and would > be > > > obsolete later. If this is not the case, I'm happy to mix these syntaces > together. > > > > This message and any attachments (the "message") is > > > > intended solely for the intended addressees and is confidential. > > > > If you receive this message in error,or are not the intended > > > > recipient(s), > > > > please delete it and any copies from your systems and immediately notify > > > > the sender. Any unauthorized view, use that does not comply with its > purpose, > > > > dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. > > > > Since the > > > internet > > > > cannot guarantee the integrity of this message which may not be > > > > reliable, > BNP > > > PARIBAS > > > > (and its subsidiaries) shall not be liable for the message if modified, > changed or > > > falsified. > > > > Do not print this message unless it is necessary, consider the > > > > environment. > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > > > ----------------------------------- > > > > > > > > Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") > > > > sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont > > > > confidentiels. > > > > Si vous recevez ce message par erreur ou s'il ne vous est pas destine, > > > > merci de le detruire ainsi que toute copie de votre systeme et d'en > > > > avertir > > > > immediatement l'expediteur. Toute lecture non autorisee, toute > > > > utilisation > de > > > > ce message qui n'est pas conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou > toute > > > > publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite. L'Internet ne > > > > permettant pas > > > d'assurer > > > > l'integrite de ce message electronique susceptible d'alteration, BNP > > > > Paribas > > > > (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce > > > > message dans > > > l'hypothese > > > > ou il aurait ete modifie, deforme ou falsifie. > > > > N'imprimez ce message que si necessaire, pensez a l'environnement. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > rsyslog mailing list > > > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > > > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > > > > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > > > > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad > of > > > sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > DON'T > > > LIKE THAT. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
