El sáb., 15 dic. 2018 a las 17:05, Michael Biebl via rsyslog (<[email protected]>) escribió: > > Am Sa., 15. Dez. 2018 um 15:02 Uhr schrieb Michael Biebl <[email protected]>: > > > > Am Sa., 15. Dez. 2018 um 13:20 Uhr schrieb Rainer Gerhards > > <[email protected]>: > > > Any concerns please let me know. > > > > Maybe interesting to you https://joeyh.name/blog/entry/version_numbers/ > > > > This would translate to 8.YYYYMMDD in your case. > > > > Has the additional benefit, that should you decide to re-architect > > rsyslog in a significant way, you can use > > 9.YYYYMMDD > > > > If there is such a potential significant change in the future, there > > is some value to it, if a user can quickly see this. > > One other benefit of keeping the 8. prefix would be, that should you > ever decide to change the versioning scheme again, you haven't burned > all version numbers up to 2018.
That's indeed a very good argument. To avoid the long version string we could also go 2-digit years and bump the "major" version on next century change ;-) Thx for the feedback so far! Rainer _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
