We have been facing the same issue. It is related to "full buffer" for
/dev/log device, which is used by sudo, PAM, SSH and other services to log
authentication messages. The "unavailability" is caused by SSH not able to
write to /dev/log.
The same issue might appear with use of any other syslog server.

Peter

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 6:32 PM Ani Sinha via rsyslog <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> We rsyslog 5.8  in our centOS 6 based systems and we have bumped into the
> much discussed syslog issue where when log forwarding is enabled using tcp
> and the remote server is unavailable, after some time, the ssh connection
> to the host dies. I have been able to reproduce it and I believe the issue
> arises from the 2 sec default timeout interval set for messages to wait
> when the spooled queue (In-memory or disk or disk assisted) is completely
> full. Restarting the rsyslog service promptly bring ssh connectivity back.
>
> I have also experimented with rsyslog7 on centOS 6 system and I do not see
> the same issue.
>
> Can someone please throw some light as to what changed between rsyslog 5.8
> and rsyslog 7.10 that the issue has been fixed.  Are there other issues
> with rsyslog7 which I should be aware of?
>
> thanks
> ani
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad
> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
> DON'T LIKE THAT.
>
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to