Hi

Just trying to clarify If an omfile action written with RainerScript syntax 
will honour legacy declared $FileOwner / $FileGroup

For example :

$FileOwner root
$FileGroup example

action(type="omfile" template="test" file="/var/log/test_file")

I have tried this and it seems the action will honour the legacy declaration of 
default file ownership. However, is this configuration considered acceptable or 
it is something that should be avoided (according to doc *)?

Thanks



* "Be warned that legacy action format is hard to get right. It is recommended 
to use RainerScript-Style action format whenever possible"

_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
https://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to