See https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/issues/5615#issuecomment-2841088817
Am Mi., 30. Apr. 2025 um 16:54 Uhr schrieb John Chivian via rsyslog <rsyslog@lists.adiscon.com>: > > Maintainers: > > Having just upgraded to v8.2504 rsyslog is now issuing warnings about > queue.highWaterMark and queue.lowWaterMark which are not explicitly set in > our queue configurations. > > For the queues that have an explicitly set size, the warnings indicate > that both highWaterMark and lowWaterMark values are being set to 90% of the > queue size. I.E. a queue with size 32768 gets highWaterMark and lowWaterMark > values of 29430. > > For the queues that do not have an explicitly set size, the warnings > indicate that both highWaterMark and lowWaterMark values are being set to > 900, a value that is 90% of the default queue size. > > This leads me to believe that either the warning message is incorrect, or > that the logic that calculates the default lowWaterMark size is incorrect. > > I am not sure of what rsyslog’s behavior would be with both the > highWaterMark and lowWaterMark values set identically, but it’s probably not > what’s intended. > > Regards, > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > https://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of > sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T > LIKE THAT. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list https://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
