Kenn, I appreciate the confirmation that the feature works. I have tried a number of different ways, including the more granular use of permissions at the queue level.
Can you share the exact permissions you give to a group to allow them to assign an owner to a ticket using People -> Owner driop down, as well as the exact permissions you give to a group to allow them to be assigned a ticket? I think I've tried all reasonable configurations, and it is not working for me. My version of RT is 3.4.5 ... what version are you running? Thanks, Bill -----Original Message----- From: Kenneth Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 2:21 PM To: William Catlan Cc: Ruslan Zakirov; [email protected] Subject: Re: [rt-users] Cannot assign ticket William Catlan wrote: >> 3.6. Assigning a Ticket >> >> Tickets can have an owner-the user responsible for working on the >> > ticket or > >> for coordinating the work. To assign a ticket to someone, go to the >> > People > >> form from the ticket display page, and select the user from the Owner >> drop-down list, as shown in Figure 3-7. This list contains the >> > usernames of > >> all the users allowed to own tickets in the ticket's current queue. >> >> I try this, and only "Nobody" appears as an option. >> > Grant right OwnTicket to groups/users who should be able to OwnTicket. > http://wiki.bestpractical.com/?OwnTicket > > Thanks Ruslan. Of course, I did grant that right to a group, at both > the Queue and Global levels, along with SeeQueue, but I still could not > assign a ticket to someone in the group. > > I am hoping that someone will confirm this is a bug, or show me > something I missed. > > Bill > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users > > Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com > Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. > Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com > > > We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html > > Bill, If you already have a group with the correct permissions to see a ticket (seeQueue, SeeTicket, etc.) for a specific Queue, why in the world do you also grant any global rights at all? The whole point of making a Queue have group specific rights allows much more specific de-bugging when it comes to problems like this,. I think too many users of RT use the "shotgun" approach to granting rights and privileges. GLobal stuff just might be negateing any Queue specific group rights. It's almost like a programmer who isnb't sure he checked for something in his code so he puts the same code that does the checking all over the progrm. It's redundant and makes everything much more difficult to debug. I think you need to go back to the drawing board on rights and decide how to tighten up the rights by being specific, not global and then see what you get and debug from there. That is how ours is set up and we have 23 Queues (for individual IT software support groups ) and more than twice than many groups (1 group for technical support of an application and 1 group for the user - who get less rights). Plus, we have created an approval workflow that allows for a specific Queue to hande the review/approval/rejection process for several other Queues and ALL work and documentation stays with the original ticket number, even though the original ticket make be moved to different Queues. This cannot be done when you have a bunch of shotgun/global rights floating around. Hopes this concept helps. Kenn _______________________________________________ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
