On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 01:17:07PM -0600, Nick Metrowsky wrote: > > Hi Todd, > > Thank you for writing. So, based upon you message, the validation is > defined on a custom field by custom field basis. I sort of thought so, > as I could not find an option to set this up globally. Having a global > configuration capability may become a useful feature in the future, as > folks may want to choose from a library of validations; as opposed to > setting up validations on a field by field basis. >
I agree. Lots of extensions could be made for different types of validation. Looking at the RT code, I'm surprised there is no Callback for adding new ones. I'm sure Jesse would take a patch for that. -Todd _______________________________________________ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
