>Hi,
>
>Lots of great stuff on this list and the wiki about multiple instances
>pointing to different database instances (rt_math, rt_english). However,
>I interested to know if anyone has set up multiple instances pointing to
>the same db instance?
I have. I might have a production 3.4.2 instance, and a test 3.6.1 instance.
(Sometimes this is ok if the database schema is the same, otherwise not.)
Makes it easy to try out 3.6.1 in a real situation, without requiring
eveyone to upgrade at the same time.
Anyway, your scenario is exactly what I planned on, if I need
extra performance. I don't think there would be a locking issue,
since you'd have the same issue between multiple fcgi processes
on the "same" RT instance.
bobg
>
>Why?
>
>Out support office in the UK is seeing very slow response times, we'd
>like to try hosting an instance in the UK, which connects to the same
>database that the instance here in California uses. Hopefully, serving
>the pages locally will improve page load speed.
>
>My biggest concern is around database locking -- does RT 3.2.1 do
>database level locking or application level locking. Not worth
>corrupting my database!
>
>thanks,
>
>Chris
>_______________________________________________
>http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
>Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
>Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
>Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
