On 11/30/06, Filip Rembialkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>
> That sounds surprisingly high. But you're also testing with
> an...older RT. And I know we've made some big performance
> improvements since then. I can't guarantee that we've fixed whatever
> you're running into, but coming up to 3.4.6 or 3.6 is strongly
> recommended.
>
>
actually i discovered this while evaluating RT 3.6.1 :)
I was talking about 3.4.1, because the results are very similar.
to be precise, I made this test again, just for a single home page view,
and have posted SQL log for single home page view here:
http://depesz.com/various/rt-3.6.1-homepage-view-sql-log.html
if you look at this, you will know what I mean
Thanks for great report and good representation. Could you spend some
time and write instructions about how to create such report? :)
so the question is still valid.
is it needed to ask all these queries?
can we optimize it somehow?
yep, at least get rid of the second line in your log. try attached
patch. don't forget to purge mason cache.
greets,
Filip
--
Best regards, Ruslan.
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
