On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 03:47:45PM -0500, Schincke, Keith D. (JSC-IT)[MEI]
wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> The Best Practical web site says they are working to get RT 508
> compliant.
>
> Has version 3.6.1 or newer been validated?
As far as I know, the law doesn't provide for an 'official' validation
program. I believe we do the right things to be 508-compliant and would
love to know about any outstanding issues anyone is aware of. I _do_
know that RT is used by blind users with screen-readers who have no
trouble with our semantic markup.
Best,
Jesse
> If it has not been validated, how has any users handled this issue?
>
> Thanks for any information,
>
> Keith
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
--
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
