On Apr 8, 2008, at 5:29 AM, Boris Lytochkin wrote:

When Quoting some transaction with multiple text/plain attachments
(one for message, and some other as named attachment) wrong
attachment can be selected.
Patch forces attachments w/o name to be selected as source for
quoting.


I wonder if it would make more sense to look at the Content- Disposition: header (so we could do smart things with text attachments the original sender intentionally inlined.)

thoughts?

===============================================================
--- Transaction_Overlay.pm~     Tue Apr  8 12:45:32 2008
+++ Transaction_Overlay.pm      Tue Apr  8 12:45:32 2008
@@ -388,6 +388,7 @@
    elsif ( $Attachment->ContentType() =~ '^multipart/' ) {
        my $plain_parts = $Attachment->Children();
$plain_parts->ContentType( VALUE => ($PreferredContentType || 'text/plain') );
+        $plain_parts->Limit(FIELD => 'Filename', VALUE => '');

        # If we actully found a part, return its content
if ( $plain_parts->First && $plain_parts->First->Content ne '' ) {



--
Boris Lytochkin,
JSC e-port, Moscow <ContentObj.patch>_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

Reply via email to