On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 12:08, Jesse Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> *) Signatures on comments are useless and just take up screen real estate > > That depends on your organization and how you use RT. But I could see "Do > comments get signatures appended by default" as a reasonable config file > option. That is the idea I started from & would be most important, to me. The other stuff was just fleshing out a 'what if'. >> *) Replying in-line is ackward as you can't simply mark all text below the >> point where you stop typing and delete all > > That actually argues for a more "outlook like" way to handle signatures. > Appending them entirely after the fact. No idea about Outlook, but appending at the very end is, for me, a Very Good Thing as it makes replying cleanly a lot easier. >> *) Sometimes, you do not want to have a signature on replies > IIRC, this is the first time in over a decade of releasing RT that I've > heard the feature request. Could you talk about some actual use cases where > this is an issue? Basically, when I know people well and don't want to mess up a perfectly fine email by all the usual corporate stuff at the end. Not too high priority, granted. Just a nice to have. To summarize, the only thing I would really want is an option to not attach anything on comments, the rest is optional/nice-to-have. Richard _______________________________________________ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
