That's how my private queues are set up, but that doesn't prevent spammers from trying every possible email address on my server, when they do find a private one they get this return email. Perhaps I misunderstood .. is there a spot to change that behavior for everyone and unprivileged?
Curtis Kenneth Crocker wrote: > Curtis, > > > Try removing those permissions from EVERYONE and UNPRIVILEGED to > PRIVILEGED only. Hope this helps. > > Kenn > LBNL > > On 8/20/2008 10:48 AM, Curtis Bruneau wrote: >> Is there any way to not notify the sender when they don't have >> permission? I don't mind the root@ notification but spammers just >> hammer all our queues and the closed ones don't have a spam filter on >> it .. so it causes tons of backscatter (spoofed sender returns spam). >> All our public queues are controlled mostly through web forms and >> other apps, so there's no reason to notify anyone about permissions >> in these cases for us. If there's any reason why this would be a bad >> idea I wouldn't mind hearing too. >> >> -- >> /RT could not load a valid user, and RT's configuration does not allow >> for the creation of a new user for this email >> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). >> >> You might need to grant 'Everyone' the right 'CreateTicket' for the >> queue queue::blah. >> -- >> >> /Thanks >> Curtis >> >> _______________________________________________ >> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users >> >> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com >> Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. >> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com >> > > > _______________________________________________ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
