On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Atro Tossavainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I was wondering if anybody has already dealt with the issue of RT either > autoresponding to all incoming messages or not autoresponding to any at > all. Specifically, I'd like to try to implement recommendations of RFC > 3834 in the autoresponder - such as, if RT gets mail from another auto- > responder that is easily identifiable as such, to stop generating loops. > Any pointers will be welcome. > > -- > Atro Tossavainen (Mr.) Not sure if I remember this correctly, but autoresponse e-mails should have/contain a header with something like "Precedence: bulk". I am not sure what it is between bulk|junk|list, but given that, you can check for the existence of that header in your MTA or procmail rule and stop that mail from getting to RT. My RT usage knowledge is quite rusty after over 1 year not using it, so you'll excuse me. I am just catching up. There might be other elegant ways than this. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "Okay guys. This is Kenya. You pay taxes because you feel philanthropic, unlike our MPs!" -- Kenneth Marende, Speaker, 10th Parilament.
_______________________________________________ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com