On Wed  4.Mar'09 at 11:29:38 -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
> Reading the code in Ticket_Overlay around line 2730-2750 it would  
> appear that this is deliberate.  For someone to reassign a ticket to  
> someone else on their reply, they must be the current owner.  For me  
> to take it back and close it, I need to separately Steal it, then  
> Resolve it.
> 
> Would you accept a patch that allows implicit Steal like this?
>

Nope. That would entirely defeat ownership-as-locking. 
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: [email protected]


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

Reply via email to