Jesse, I now have some time to dig into the code and/or docs. Have you already tackled this, or would a patch be welcome?
On Jan 27, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Jesse Vincent wrote: > Following up on my own post: > > RFC 2822, 3.6: > ...for the purposes of this standard, header fields SHOULD NOT be > reordered > when a message is transported or transformed. More importantly, the > trace > header fields and resent header fields MUST NOT be reordered, and > SHOULD be > kept in blocks prepended to the message. > > So, if we're reordering the received lines, it's a bug I'd like to > see fixed. > Assuming they don't otherwise compromise the system (which is > really, always the case), > patches would most certainly be welcome. > > Best, > Jesse -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness _______________________________________________ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: [email protected] Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
