Tom,
Thanks for the link. After reading the info, I believe that RT could /easily/ be used to promote such a process. Some terms would have to be re-named or their meaning translated, but the overall process design is VERY similar to what we do now in our organization. I have developed quite a bit of documentation (guides, flowcharts, rules, definitions, etc.) that supports our method for getting work done in this manner. SCRUM is a whole new set of terminology, but the process isn't much different than the way I did things 35 years ago in a Forbes 100 company. Interesting how some things just seem to cycle around, but with newer coats of paint.
Kenn LBNL On 3/19/2009 12:38 PM, Tom Lahti wrote:
Ken Crocker wrote:Rudiger, I'm not sure what you mean when you refer to "SCRUM".http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrum_(development) P.S. I hate scrum :/
_______________________________________________ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: [email protected] Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
